Books

“South of Pico” and Noah Davis at the Hammer Museum

August 3, 2025

Noah Davis at Hammer Art Museum, Los Angeles, California

A little over eight years ago, MOCA presented an extraordinary exhibition of paintings by Kerry James Marshall, and I thought I would run the review I posted in this blog about that show again today, as I share a few notes and thoughts about an equally impressive show at the Hammer Museum right now: Noah Davis’s first major survey in any museum. Given that this exhibition will only be up for another four weeks, I wouldn’t want to delay anyone’s attendance by insisting that they first read Kellie Jones’s SOUTH OF PICO first, but I do want to insist that the only way to fully appreciate the cultural work that Davis undertook is to absorb at least some of the information in Jones’s examination of African American artists in Los Angeles in the 1960s and 1970s.

Davis, along with his spouse, Karon Davis, was co-founder of the Underground Museum, a cultural space that was in the Arlington Heights section of Los Angeles. While the Underground Museum was not south of Pico, as such, it was as a cultural project aligned with the self-determined affirmations that marked the intermingled efforts of a cohort of mid-century African American artists in the years following the Watts insurrection. Now it may be the case that the essays of critical appreciation in the exhibition catalogue for this show at the Hammer Museum cite Jones’s book and bring it into their discussion of Davis’s work as a contextual jump-off point, but it would have been even better for the book to have received its own place of visibility to any visitor to this show. One of the first things that one should see before starting to see Davis’s work is the cover of this book. Not everyone can afford to buy the book, of course, but that’s what libraries are for, at least at the present moment.

On the whole, the placards commenting on the evolution of Davis’s poetics as painter are both pertinent and insightful. Basic information is not taken for granted, which is more refreshing than one might expect. Which painting was Davis’s favorite? This kind of question is always worth asking, whether it is directed to a poet, songwriter, or painter because it inevitably opens up the need to address provocative issues of cultural agency. It turns out that “The Architect” was Davis’s favorite painting, and looking at it reminded me of just how much white privilege props the narratives that fantasize about individualistic heroism. Ayn Rand’s protagonist in “The Fountainhead,” Howard Roark, is white. Whatever the challenges he faces might be, the one thing he doesn’t have to do is endure the indignity that Paul Revere Williams did of having to learn to draw upside down, so that he could present his sketches of proposals to white clients while sitting opposite them, since it would be unthinkable at that time for him to be allowed to sit alongside them. Howard Roark doesn’t have an expletive-deleted clue.

One of the most haunting images in the exhibition is of a “Single Mother with Father out of the Picture” (2007-2008). While the adults are the ones mentioned in the title, it is the young daughter whose suffering is most palpable. Her arm is in a cast, and it is not hard to deduce what has led the mother to tell the father to “hit the road, Jack, and don’t you come back no more, no more.” One doesn’t have to be a trained social worker to deduce that the domestic violence may certainly have involved some degree of sexual molestation. Even as David records this situation unflinchingly, he also was able to conjure up a level of mythic enchantment. “Year of the Coxswain” grapples with the heft required in the communal effort required to give meaning to our brief sojourn on the river run of eternity’s vast delta.

OTHER REVIEWS

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2025-06-16/noah-davis-ucla-hammer-museum

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/21/arts/design/noah-davis-painter-hammer-museum.html

*********

billmohrpoet.com

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Backlit by Blackness: Kerry James Marshall’s “Mastry” at MOCA

A couple of weeks ago, Hye Sook Park reported that Kerry James Marshall’s retrospective exhibition at MOCA was a must-see event. Even before her enthusiastic commentary, in fact, I had made a note in my memory’s calendar of the closing date of his show, which grew ever closer as the month has gone by. Getting time to see his show has not been easy: my teaching work glided straight from the end of the spring semester into the summer session course I am teaching without the slightest pause.

Two days ago, on Friday, we might have headed north, but on Thursday the place where my mother is being cared wrote me and said that her doctor would be visiting her on Friday; since I had never talked to him face-to-face in the past eight months, that priority cancelled any other possibility. We did drive up to Beyond Baroque that evening, though, and heard David St. John read from The Last Troubadour, and Christopher Merrill read an account of his long friendship with Agha Shahid Ali. As always, it’s a long trip from Long Beach to Beyond Baroque, but this time it was truly worth it. David is one of this country’s very best poets, and Christopher’s recollections made Ali a living presence in the room. I would have liked to have heard Christopher read some of his poems, too, but his choice to read a single piece made it all the more memorable.

On Saturday, with a rare empty square on the kitchen calendar, we saddled up and headed north. Marshall’s show is easily worth more than one visit, and I hope to return before it closes, if only to spend more time with an unframed painting from 2003 entitled “7 a.m. Sunday Morning.” Before I briefly talk about that painting, I want to list several pieces that impressed me almost as much: “Beach Towel”; “Slow Dance”; “Red (If They Come In the Morning”; “Frankenstein” and “Bride of Frankenstein”; “School of Beauty, School of Culture”; “Heirlooms & Accessories”; “Chalk Up Another One”; “Fingerwag”; and “The Actor Hezekiah Washington as Julian Carlton Taliesen Murderer of the Flank Lloyd Wright Family.” If I have not included the housing project paintings in this list, it is only because they have already drawn more than sufficient critical attention.

The scale of Marshall’s work is often startling in its acute depictions of personal identity within the encompassing hemispheres of economic and racial confinements. Circling in a room of fermenting ordinariness, the figures in “Slow Dance” are both holding tight to each other’s poignant desires for more than has been allotted them, and grateful that at least they have each other for the moment. It more honestly addresses the romantic plight of marginal individuals, no matter what their race, than any painting I have ever absorbed into my memory.

The room the dancers inhabit is exactly what could have been foreseen by anyone who looks closely at the furniture of an engagement scene in a cheap restaurant. Even if one imagines the couple looking back at each other, and then unclasping to reach for a celebratory sip of their drinks, one would hardly expect either one to feel more comfortable in the minimally padded chairs the restaurant has provided them. Their fond ebullience is as much a performance meant for themselves as the onlookers they are posing for. The mise-en-scene of the restaurant extends to the smallest details of an urban backyard: the pink flip-flops being worn by the sunbather in “Beach Towel,” for instance. Equally pertinent in scope, one should not overlook the oversized earrings of “Fingerwag.” Marshall has a profound ability to augment his excavation of that which the ideological normative would prefer not to be present at all.

Jed Rasula mentions the contrast between “the politics in the poem, and the politics of the poem” in his intriguing study of American poetry anthologies. One could use the same distinction to talk about Marshall’s work, too, since in his case the politics in a painting such as “Red (If They Come in the Morning” are equally about the cultural politics of abstract painting and its reluctance to accept work done in that domain by African-American painters.

The street scene depicted in “Sunday Morning, 7 a.m.” has no overt politics, and yet the speeding white car that the running child seems to avoid by not much than a second and a half can hardly be separated from the more obvious repression cited in “Chalk Up Another One.” The adults in the post-dawn background stay safely on the sidewalk with its immediate access to the liquor store. The child has other comforts in mind. What might await that young man is hinted at in the right hand portion of the painting, in which Marshall’s synaesthetic handling of urban light portends some future visitation. Softened by a prismatic uncertainty, as if a late spring day will fulfill its potential for revelation, one can almost hear Whitman’s pure contralto sing the organ loft of some unanticipated destiny. Redemption is not an option, so don’t get carried away with hope, this light suggests. On the other hand, there is no reason to settle for mere survival of one’s ideals.

This show will be up through next weekend. As hard pressed for time as you might be, make every effort to catch this show. I agree with Christopher Knight’s concluding assessment in the LA Times: “Kerry James Marshall: Mastry” is the first time in a long time that MOCA’s exhibition program has felt essential. Don’t miss it.”

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-kerry-james-marshall-moca-20170320-htmlstory.html

Books

A Classic Protest Song, More Relevant than Ever: Woody Guthrie’s “Deportee”

Living in Long Beach, California is a mixed bag. While the air quality is not as bad as it is in nearby Wilmington, you are fairly safe in assuming that no one living in Santa Monica or Malibu or Huntington Beach is yearning to drive here and spend a day looking at the non-existent waves of very polluted water in Long Beach’s bay. The streets are in terrible condition; potholes abound. On the other hand, the city does have neighborhoods that provide some sense of psychological refuge from the insidiousness of the right-wing fanaticism that has become pervasive in part of this country. There is more tolerance here, even for people who support Trump. No one physically attacks them, as happens in other parts of the country to people who criticize the current occupants of the White House. For all its imperfections, Long Beach has been my home city for two decades. In many ways, its ethnic, gender, and cultural diversities represent the possibilities of a country that would still claim to have meaningful ideals. How long Long Beach, as a city, and California, as a state, can hold out, however, is difficult to gauge. Will the dictatorial accelerant in Washington, D.C. manage to subdue California by 2028, or will it end up being the lone holdout?

California may end up, in fact, becoming the equivalent of Massachusetts in the 1972 election: the only state to object to the election of the GOP’s candidate for president. The majority of voters in 49 states preferred Richard Nixon, who then ordered a massive bombing campaign in Vietnam called “Operation Lineback II.” Its targets included civilian sites, such as Hanoi’s main hospital. If you ask me if I have forgiven the people who voted for Nixon, the answer is no. If you ask me whether I believe that the current occupants of the White House feel any shame or guilt about this part of American history, the answer is no.

I don’t hate the country I live in. I just loathe its hypocrisy. “Peace with honor” was supposedly Nixon’s goal. What honor? The honor of having dropped more tonnage of bombs on Vietnam than were dropped in all of Europe during all of World War II? The honor of targeting a hospital? The honor of My Lai? The honor of a young girl drenched in napalm and running down a country road?

Would it be any different if I lived elsewhere? China? Russia? Indonesia? Israel? Are you kidding? The leaders of those countries are even more appalling than Trump, who is currently engaged in a campaign that implicitly is aligned with an ideology that justifies ethnic cleansing. He is hardly the first U.S. president to promote domestic partitioning or to favor one set of people over another. The Displaced Persons Act of 1948 was intended to address the assistance that this country might offer to those in Europe who were displaced by the ravages of World War II.

At the same time, this country was loading people who did the hardest work for the least money onto airplanes and sending them back to Mexico. One of those planes crashed, on January 28, 1948. Woody Guthrie wrote a poem about it, which later was set to music by Martin Hoffman. This song is a classic piece of protest art. What amazes me is how few people have heard of it. Of course, I probably would not know of it if it were not for a friend, the songwriter Patty Zeitlin, who also attended the Church in Ocean Park back in the mid-1970s. It is in her honor that I nominate this song to be part of your playlist today.

“Deportee (Plane Wreck at Los Gatos)” by Woody Guthrie and Martin Hoffman

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Deportee%3A+(Palne+Wreck+at+Los+Gatos&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:6a291eed,vid:qu-duTWccyI,st:0

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Deportee%3A+(Palne+Wreck+at+Los+Gatos&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:b86d1d23,vid:lAgRmr0DafA,st:0
(Bruce Springsteen’s cover version)

POSTSCRIPT: After writing this blog entry, I found that a recent newspaper article by Petula Dvorak in the Washington Post has also addressed the relevance of this song.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2025/01/31/migrant-deportations-woody-guthrie-deportees/

(This article was published less than two weeks after Donald Trump was inaugurated.)

****

Thought experiment: Maybe Stephen Colbert should invite Mr. Springsteen on his recently cancelled television show to sing this song.

Books

John Martin, the One and Only Editor and Publisher of Black Sparrow Press (1930-2025)

It wasn’t until I started working as the first poetry editor of BACHY magazine, in late 1971 at Papa Bach Bookstore in Los Angeles that I became aware of John Martin and Black Sparrow Press. Until then, I knew only a handful of little magazines, such as KAYAK, APPLE, THE LAMP IN THE SPINE, and INVISIBLE CITY. Although Bukowski was the best known of the poets that Black Sparrow published, I remember that as the decade went being more interested in other poets that Martin was publishing at the time: Diane Wakoski and Robert Kelly, in particular. Wakoski’s “Smudging” remains one of my all-time favorites.

As the years went on, I discovered that Black Sparrow’s success was largely due to the capacity of its editor to do an extraordinary amount of work, seven days a week. John Martin’s publishing enterprise was a one-person operation, during its first half-dozen years Martin routinely worked a full-time job as the manager of an office supply shop as well as working as the editor and shipping clerk for his own literary project. It’s my understanding that he published close to a thousand titles, by the time he closed up shop.

Bukowski wasn’t the only Los Angeles based poet published by Black Sparrow, of course. He also championed the work of Wanda Coleman, and Martin deserves much praise for having done so. One might be tempted to think that Martin published her at the first opportunity he had, but in fact Coleman approached him with a sheaf of poems years before her first publication with Black Sparrow, ART IN THE COURT OF THE BLUE FAG. If one reads the correspondence between Coleman and Martin in Coleman’s archive at UCLA, one learns that Martin certainly encouraged Coleman from the start, but also informed her that early poems were overdetermined and far too convinced of where they were wanted to go from the very outset. Martin counseled Coleman to learn to wait to hear from the poem itself about where it wanted to go. If that sounds like familiar advice, it’s because John Keats’s “negative capability” had saturated postmodern poetry by that point.

One of my favorite books by Martin was HAWK MOON by Sam Shepard, which never took off as far as I can tell. I don’t think Black Sparrow ever did a second printing, though the collection was issued again by Performing Arts Journal. I just remember that I saw a copy of it on the shelves of Either/Or Bookstore in Hermosa Beach for years and years and always expected it to be gone whenever I dropped into the store. Finally, though, with some of the Christmas bonus money I received from Beach City Newspapers in 1980, I swung by the store (which was a few blocks away from David Asper Johnson’s publishing headquarters and bought it.

Another of my favorites was Michael McClure’s Rare Angel. On the other hand, I never ever felt at home with Clayton Eshleman’s books of poems. It’s one of the ironies of a literary life that the L.A. Times asked me to review Eshleman’s “Selected Poems.” I tried very hard to be gracious and enthusiastic about his book, and many friends said that I was more generous than I needed to be. It wasn’t enough to placate Eshleman, though, let alone please him.

Martin didn’t believe there were any serious poets in Los Angeles worthy of being published by Black Sparrow outside of Bukowski and Coleman. From the point of view of a publisher who takes the business side of publishing as that which must take precedence, I would have to say that he was probably right. I suppose it could be said that his dismissal of all the poets I knew and believed only made it possible for me to build up my roster of poets for Momentum Press. One man’s rejects are another man’s betrothal.

Martin deserves to be as famous as Bukowski, even if Martin wasn’t in fact the one who “discovered” Bukowski. Too many accounts of Martin and Bukowski’s relationship overlook the fact that Bukowski had already had full-length volumes of poetry in circulation well before Martin ever purchased a six-pack and dropped in on a poet who had just a few years earlier been on the cover of the “OUTSIDER” magazine as “Outsider of the Year.” If Martin pushed Bukowski a little closer to the center of the canonical conversation, he certainly also pulled into its periphery some of us who were not even in its faintest gravitational orbit. For that, he deserves the appreciation of all the poets working in Los Angeles County.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/10/books/john-martin-dead.html

Interview // Serious Books: A Conversation with John Martin

Books

Robert Mezey — A Tribute at the Huntington Library

I remember hearing Robert Mezey (1936 – 2020) read at San Diego State College in the spring, 1968. I was 20 years old and just beginning to get familiar contemporary poetry. I was taking two poetry courses with Glover Davis, one in creative writing and one survey of poetry course in which Sylvia Plath’s ARIEL was read in its entirety. Davis had studied at Fresno State under Philip Levine as an undergraduate who had first served a four year enlistment in the U.S. Navy., and he had then attended the University of Iowa’s MFA program. In his classes, I read — and re-read — Hart Crane’s THE BRIDGE as well as many poets in Donald Allen’s anthology, THE NEW AMERICAN POETRY.
Unlike now, when the budget to bring poets to a large state university campus such as Cal State Long Beach is not something the poets on campus have any control over, Davis was able to bring Allen Ginsberg, Robert Mezey, and Philip Levine to San Diego State in a single semester. Two years later, when I began reading an anthology Mezey had co-edited, NAKED POETRY, I also purchased THE DOOR STANDING OPEN, Mezey’s “new and selected” volume of poems, and it served as an outstanding example of the transformation that many poets made, who had attained recognition in the Hall-Pack-Simpson anthology, NEW POETS OF ENGLAND AND AMERICA.
Mezey’s shift to free verse, however, did not last the rest of his life. The drum-kit of meter is not that easily put aside, given what a pleasure it can be to work the high-hat. By the very early 1980s, Mezey was adamantly back at work in the formal arena. If it was unfashionable, and cost him a larger audience, he didn’t seem to care.
When he died, of covid-19 at age 85 in 2020, there was of course no public gathering to mourn one of our finest poets. Among the many who particularly admired him in Los Angeles, one would have to count both Suzanne Lummis and myself. Given how often Suzanne and I diverge in our tastes, it is no small thing that we both savor Mezey’s poems, and I was pleased to learn that she was selected to speak at the recent gathering at the Huntington Library in Mezey’s honor. Among the poets who spoke, in fact, I thought that Suzanne Lummis did the best job in not only speaking about his work, but in reading his poems so that every subtle palpitation in the verse resounded with an understated fervor. I also appreciated Jodie Hollander’s recollection of her first meeting with him and how much he subsequently nurtured her poetic maturation.

I myself had hoped to attend, but circumstances and my own faltering capacities led my absence. However, the event was recorded and is now available on-line. It’s worth watching all the way, I assure you, if only to hear Mezey read his great sonnet to the poet Thomas Hardy.
https://rail.huntington.org/Share/dqte03tx036dfa07156vcl82v6t785d3

One of the key things that comes across in the tribute is that Mezey truly lived a literary life: poet, translator, anthologist, and critic. Perhaps my personal fondness for Bob Mezey, however, derives from his commitment to other poets in ways that don’t fall into any literary category. For instance, while Dick Barnes was mentioned several times as Mezey’s co-translator of Borges’s poetry, no one apprized, let alone praised, the role Mezey played in getting a posthumous collection of Dick Barnes’s poems into print (A WORD LIKE FIRE). I had published one of Barnes’s books of poems and it meant the world to me that Bob Mezey did not let Dick’s work fall by the wayside.

I must say one thing about a particular comment by Dana Gioia about the second edition of NAKED POETRY: expanding the table of contents so that it included a greater variety of poets did not make it “useless.” Does Gioia not remember that the first edition had only ONE living woman poet (Denise Levertov)? ONE! And not a single poet of color? NONE. Even Donald Allen’s anthology had four women and one African-American poet, and that was in 1960. A decade later, the first edition of NAKED POETRY amounted to a full scale erection of a white man canon.

These kinds of choices do make a difference. Think of the difference it would have made to Bob Kaufman’s reputation if Allen had included him. Allen certainly knew about Kaufman’s work in the late 1960s, so he couldn’t plead that he simply hadn’t read as widely as he should have. I myself have faltered in that regard, so I am not in any position to judge Mezey for a lapse, but I’m not willing to sit back and accept Gioia’s dismissal of the second edition of NAKED POETRY. I do think it is the case that that anthology had already made its most important contribution, which was to help both Weldon Kees and Kenneth Patchen to regain some footing in the canonical discussion.

I want to close this post by coming back to Mezey’s homage to Hardy, in which the birth of Hardy is recounted as a near-death experience; Hardy only survives being set aside as stillborn because the midwife in attendance coaxed the lingering soul in Hardy’s infant body into taking its initial breath. In describing Hardy’s evasion of death before he had begun living, Mezey reminds us of our own unfathomable odds in being plucked from the abyss of unconsciousness. It is a poem worth memorizing. I would even go so far as to suggest a further absorption. Memorize it, and then recite it to yourself with your eyes closed. Then open your eyes and recite it out loud, imagining your inner voice, with closed eyes, in a duet with your voice propelling the words into your quivering ears.

And then, in grateful memory, say the poet’s name: Robert Mezey.

Books

TRAMPOLINE MAGAZINE – Two New Poems by Bill Mohr

Several years ago, the poet Carol Ellis mentioned to me that she had had some poems in an on-line magazine coming out of New Orleans, TRAMPOLINE, edited by Justin Lacour. I took a look at the magazine and saw why she was so delighted to have work appear in it. The other poets in the issue were also very good. (Carol had just won Beyond Baroque’s manuscript contest with her first full-length collection, LOST AND LOCAL. Suzanne Lummis was the discerning judge in that contest.)

This morning I heard from Justin that I have two new poems in his latest issue, which has just been posted. This is my third appearance in TRAMPOLINE, and I am very grateful for his support and encouragement.

https://www.trampolinepoetry.com/


Bill Mohr at an opening of an exhibition of paintings by Hyunsook Park
(photography copyright by Linda Fry)

Books

June 14: “Joyeux anniversaire, Monsieur le Président”

Quoi de plus absurde:
“L’Etat, c’est moi.”
Mange de la merde
“Roi” de mauvaise foi!

(from an old French greeting card, marking the anniversary of Bastille Day)

*

Somewhere between twelve and fifteen thousand people showed up in Long Beach, California this morning to stress their opposition to President Trump’s solicitous dictatorship. The rally stretched for two miles, on both sides of E. Ocean Blvd., from past Bixby Park to past Temple Avenue. The L.A. Times minimized the scale of the “No Kings” protests by failing to mention the size of this rally — or even that one occurred in Long Beach. Erasure is always one of the first tactics employed by dictatorships to secure the grip of their ill-begotten power.

Books

Harley W. Lond — GoFundMe

June 9, 2025

Harley Lond on the left; Bill Gaglione on the right.
Photography by Donna Lee Philip
Haircuts and concept by Anga Badana

*

Over 50 years ago, I met a young cultural worker, Harley W. Lond, whose interests included theater, jazz, and experimental art and writing. Not only was he a major organizing force at the Burbage Theater in its early days on W. Pico Blvd., but he went on to edit and publish several issues of one of the most distinctive magazines of the small press scenes in the 1970s. INTERMEDIA was unlike any other magazine in that it was just as interested in original pieces of writing as in creating rhizomes of other artists who worked in ways that placed them at the very far margins of commodified culture. Harley Lond also facilitated the bureaucratic paperwork and financial accounts associated with the non-profit, institutional structure (Century City Educational Arts Project) that served as the umbrella for my own publishing project (Momentum Press) as well as for the Burbage Theater.

Harley went on to have a career as a journalist and editor in the culture industry’s print journals, but he is no longer able to work, even at part-time jobs at bookstores. He is facing, in fact, a major health crisis in his old age, and he needs as much support as possible. He has had to move from Hollywood to Lancaster, not because he wants to live in Lancaster, but because that is the only place he can afford as he battles cancer with the assistance of a City of Hope outpost.

I realize that many causes are asking for our attention and support now, but no donation is too small in his case not to be of help.

Please join me in helping a man whose efforts have helped and inspired many, many people in nurturing the transformations that several generations in the past 75 years have made possible.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-harley-londs-medical-journey

Books

Ends and Odds: Book Reviews by Paul Vangelisti and Bill Mohr

Paul Vangelisti has recently launched a new outlet for book reviews, ENDS AND ODDS, which can be found on the MAGRA BOOKS website. You can find his commentary on several books, as well as a review by myself on Suzanne Lummis’s anthology POETRY GOES TO THE MOVIES, as the initial installments of this project. Vangelisti, who will turn 80 years old this coming September, is an indefatigable force in contemporary poetry, if one regards that term as meaning not just a temporal domain but the spatial interminglings that only translation can initiate. Beginning with INVISIBLE CITY, a magazine he co-edited with John McBride for the entire decade of the 1970s, Vangelisti has assiduously reminded the various scenes and movements in the United States of the social and literary contextualization that translators attain in serving as “authors.” What is translation, after all, but a conversation between two authors, neither subservient, and both overheard by others who patiently listen as a representative congregation for their own chance to speak out.

As for my review about “Poetry Goes to the Movies,” I would hope that readers would make the effort to place it within the context of my blog as a whole. Here, for instance, is a list of the most frequently read posts during the past ten days:

Suzanne Lummis in “The New Yorker”
“The Alphabet” by Ron Silliman (a review from ten years ago)
D.R. Wagner — Poet and Artist (1943-2023)
Wanting Animals on Her Side: a review of two books by Lynn McGee
The Invisible Strings of Returning Pleasure: Jim Moore reviews Holly Prado’s “Weather”
Quincy Jones (1933-2024): Composer, Arranger, Producer (and Advocate for SHAFT by Issac Hayes)
Paul Vangelisti Reviews “OUTLAW THEATRE”
“A Possibility: Music at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium
The Garden City Horse Sculpture
The Sam Shepard Tribute at the Bootleg Theater
“He, Leo: The Life and Poetry of Lew Welch” by Ewan Clark
“Wicked Enchantment”: Wanda Coleman’s Selected Poems
“A Complete Unknown”: Jorge Luis Borges, Shakespeare, and Bob Dylan
Christopher Buckley’s “Cloud Memoir” — Thirty Years of Longer Poems
Jan Wesley (1962-2025): a poet whose luminous presence will linger
“I Wanna Be Loved By You: Poems on Marilyn Monroe” (including “Labials” by Bill Mohr)
Fred Voss (1952-2025): Worker Poet Extraordinaire
Either/Or Bookstore and “Barbarian Days”
Happy 50th Anniversary, Chatterton’s and Skylight Bookstores
Chatterton’s Bookstore: The Legendary Forerunner to Skylight Books
Papa Bach Bookstore – Los Angeles AND Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Kate Braverman (1949-2019): Poet and Novelist
Louis Montrose and the Spider-Man Tribute
Anacapa Review’s Third Issue
The Collected Poems of Eugene Ruggles
Reliquaries: The Sculpture of Ted Waltz
“The Moon and the Night and the Men” — John Berryman
Ed Massey: The Revivifying Artist as Intermingling Citizen (“Portraits of Hope”)
BACKLIST (Best poetry books 2000-2010)
“Spin, Spider, Spin” – Patty Zeitlin’s Songs for Children
The Collected Poems of Eugene Ruggles

Condescending commentary about the importance of verbs notwithstanding, Suzanne Lummis does deserve to be the next poet laureate of Los Angeles. Living less than three miles from the northern border of Orange County, however, I am very unlikely to have a vote in this matter. Ah! Did I not once write a post about how the selection of the poet laureate should be put to a vote by all the poets who have earned the muse’s enfranchisement?

Onward!

*

Here and There: Two New Books by Richard Milazzo & Kyle Harvey
REVIEW by Paul Vangelisti

https://www.magrabooks.com/ends-odds/2025/4/29/fxnnp6e1443iyxkycn3630otizdy2u

*

ON THE AVENUE: VINCENT KATZ’ DAFFODIL

https://www.magrabooks.com/ends-odds/2025/5/30/ie0hkgive9oycesgadyu1i8v69y9vi

*

OFF-SCREEN: A Double Feature of Poets and Movies
by Bill Mohr

https://www.magrabooks.com/ends-odds/2025/5/24/off-screen-a-double-feature-of-poets-and-movies

Books

“Of Being Numerous” — George Oppen’s Poem Read on “Harry’s Poetry Hour”

Harry Northup is a poet and actor whose contributions to cinema and poetry have made him an extraordinarily distinctive figure in American culture. The pleasure he takes as an advocate of those who enable poetry to flourish is particularly on view in his program, “Harry’s Poetry Hour,” which is broadcast out of MPTF (Motion Picture Television Fund) in Woodland Hills. His guests on over 250 episodes include poets from all over the nation and he does not restrict himself to presenting just the work of living poets.

Given that Harry’s own poetry has frequently involved long sequences of poems, it should come as no surprise that he recently invited several Los Angeles based poets to participate in a reading of George Oppen’s “Of Being Numerous,” which won the Pulitzer Prize over 50 years ago. Along with Paul Vangelisti and Phoebe MacAdams, I took part in reading a portion of Oppen’s long sequence, which is now available on YouTube. By chance, I was assigned particularly poignant sections concerning his recollections of what he observed as a solider in Europe during World War II.

One might be tempted to believe that having won a Pulitzer might suffice to make a poet canonical, and yet Paul Hoover omitted him from the Norton Anthology of Postmodern Poetry. (Fortunately, Oppen is included in Library of America’s “Poets of World War II.) Being pushed aside by an editor such as Hoover has consequences: too few young poets are familiar with his work. As such, I would recommend that anyone not familiar with “Of Being Numerous” get a copy of the poem to read in tandem with the broadcast the second time through. The individual numbers of the sections of the sequence are omitted by the readers in the MPTF presentation, and it will slightly reframe the poem to have the numbers mark off the increments as you experience the voicing of the poem.

Don’t wait, though, to hear the poem, simply because you don’t have time to get to a library.
Listen to it now, and be prepared for one of the most intricate and deeply felt explorations of the human condition by any poet whose work deserves a place on your shelves at home.

Books

The Burgeoning Canon of Contemporary Poetry (Part One)


Lynn McGee – Science Says Yes


William Archilla – “S Is For”


David Rigsbee — “”Watchman in the Knife Factory”


Juan Felipe Herrera — The Roots of a Thousand Embraces: dialogues”


Saeed Jones – “All the Music at the End of the World”


A.B. Spellman — “Between the Night and the Music”


Rae Armantrout – “Go Figure”


Jon Davis — “Fearless Now & Nameless”


Elaine Sexton – “Site Specific”


GLASS JAW


Ostriker — Holy and Broken Bliss