Author Archives: billmohr

LIVESTREAMED — The 50th Annual New Year’s Day Reading at St. Mark’s (NYC)

LIVESTREAMED — The New Year’s Day Marathon (NYDM) of Poetry from the St. Mark’s Poetry Project (2024)

https://www.poetryproject.org/marathon

Beyond Baroque, in Venice, California, and The Poetry Project, in NYC, are the two oldest major alternative poetry sites in the United States. Both have been operating for more than a half-century; 2024 will mark the 50th time that a mass reading has taken place to kick off the new year. The announcement of this year’s event is full of well-earned selfie wiz: “NYDM is … a mutually agreed upon fever-dream …. (of) like-minded freaks.”

The Poetry Project’s 50th Annual New Year’s Day Marathon will begin at 11AM on January 1st and go to about midnight. The event will be divided into two parts: 11AM–5PM and 6PM–midnight.

The entire event will also be livestreamed. Livestream tickets are donation-based, $5–15 suggested. Separate tickets for each part.

Featured poets include:
Edmund Berrigan
Don Yorty
Greg Masters
Sarah Schulman
Todd Colby
John Godfrey
Brenda Coultas
Eleni Sikelianos
Lee Ann Brown
Patricia Spears Jones
Erica Hunt
Edwin Torres with Sean Meehan
Anselm Berrigan
CAConrad
Fred Moten
Cecilia Vicuña
Kim Rosenfield
Eileen Myles with Ryan Sawyer and Steve Gunn
Karen Finley
Rachel Levitsky
Chelsea Manning
Anne Waldman
Jim Behrle

CFA calls for System-Wide CSU Strike on January 22, 2024

Friday, December 22, 2023

One month from now, either a decent contract === or on strike!!!

The leadership of the California Faculty Association has called on the entire faculty at all campuses of the California State University system to go on strike during the first week of classes in the Spring semester, 2024. The CFA wants to obtain for both tenured and adjunct faculty a salary commensurate with the skills and knowledge we bring to the training of the future work force. The five percent pay raise offered by the Chancellor’s Office is a pathetic joke, given the extraordinary inflation that has undermined the purchase power of our income in the past eighteen months. The fact that inflation seems recently to have leveled off does not mean that faculty have somehow magically found themselves on an even economic keel again. We are still reeling from the enormous increases in everything from rent to food to car insurance. And many of us rent. How could we possibly afford to buy a house in Southern California, where almost half of the 450,000 students enrolled in the CSU system study.

Quite bluntly, what the CSU is offering amounts to a pay cut. There’s no other way to put it. In point of fact, the California Faculty Association is not asking for a pay raise. Instead, we want to put a stop to the constant erosion of our salaries; and if CO needs a reminder of why we do not trust them, let us consider how CSU faculty were promised a four percent raise after the last contract was voted on and approved by the CFA (though I myself voted “no,” since I suspected a double-cross was in the works). What happened to that four percent? Funny you should ask. It was reduced to three percent because the legislature and the governor thought that trimming one percent from the union approved agreement would send the CFA a signal of how little power they have. Well, we have no desire to be sucker-punched again and we intend to show you how much power we do have.

CSU faculty are of course not the only workers who have felt the impingements of inflation. Other workers have flexed their muscle, and the outcome has been a mitigation of the inroads that inflation has made on their income. As a quick review of other employers who have recognized the extent that inflation has hampered the ability of workers to make ends meet, here are some other results:

July, 2023
“United Airlines pilots will get immediate wage-rate increases of 13.8% to 18.7%, depending on the type of plane they fly, followed by four smaller annual raises”

Full-time United Parcel Service (UPS) drivers got at least a ten percent pay raise this year in their new five year contract.

Here is the pay raise schedule that was agreed upon by the United Teachers Los Angeles:
3% retroactive to July 1, 2022
4% retroactive to Jan. 1
3% effective July 1, 2023
4% effective Jan. 1, 2024
3% effective July 1, 2024
4% effective Jan. 1, 2025

Why should CSU professors accept only a five percent raise in 2023-2024 when a high school teacher is getting seven percent between July 1, 2023 and January 1, 2024? That raise is in addition to a retroactive raise meant to compensate teachers for the extraordinary amount of inflation in 2022-2023.

Once again, let me reiterate the actual jump in the cost of living.

CNN BUSINESS
“Inflation may be cooling — but drivers can’t seem to catch. break” by Elisabeth Buchwald, 8:08 a.m. August 12, 2023

“It will cost 19.5 percent more to repair your car now than it did a year ago, according to July’s Consumer Price Index report, released Thursday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. …. (C)ar insurance (is) up 17.8 percent from a year ago.”

The CO has claimed that it has “deep respect” for the work that faculty do, but that “rapidly escalating costs of operation” preclude any pay raise beyond five percent. Their recalcitrance has a long history. In my own case, even after a half-dozen years of work following my promotion to full professor, my actual income has only minimally budged from the salary I was offered when I was appointed an assistant professor at California State University, Long Beach in 2006. The effects of inflation over the past 18 years have been that devastating.

CSU Faculty have given the Chancellor’s Office a more than fair warning. This past semester included a one-day strike at four different campuses. Apparently, the CO believes that one day is the most that we are willing to walk on a picket line. We’ll see how things stand once the second week of classes start in late January and still no students are learning what they paid tuition for.

In the meantime, the money that was promised faculty as a very small raise starting in July, 2023 is five months overdue. Brotman Hall claims that it takes considerable time for each person’s paycheck to be calculated, but my guess is that by stalling the payment of this money, the CO has used the funds to invest in short-timer, high interest loans, thereby swelling its coffers through the use of money we have already earned.

In case you somehow think that the CO’s accountants don’t know how the capitalist game is played, think again. When students pay their fees in advance of the semester, that money doesn’t just sit around twiddling its manicured thumbs. That liquidity is used to make more cash ASAP. It’s the education business, and the business of education pays its administrators very well. Those who do the educating are asked to settle for “deep respect.”

Happy Solstice, Lenny Durso!

Thursday, December 21, 2013

On the shortest day of 2023, I am thinking of a friend who lives in Turkey. Lenny Durso is one of the most valiant writers I have ever met, and he deserves to be far better known. Over forty years ago, he was the proprietor of a bookstore in Santa Monica that didn’t shy away away from displaying the work of contemporary poets. After the store folded, he moved back to NYC, and then eventually settled in Turkey, where he administered several ESL programs.On the dedication page of HIDDEN PROOFS, you’ll find “To Lenny Durso & all the poets I published.”

He has a website that features his recent preferences in poetry and it’s a list that young poets could learn quite a lot from. Poems by the following poets appear in leonarddurso.com:

Ai
Su Tung-p’o
Ray Di Palma
Orhan Veli Kanik
Anna Akhmatova
Edna St. Vincent Millay
Gu Cheng
Iktay Rifat
Wendell Berry
Wakayama Bokusui
Paul Eludard
Cemal Sureya
Tess Gallagher
Kim Ku-yong
Po Chu-i
Hwang Jini
Kil Jae
Lu Yu
Hsu Kan
Li Ch’in-chao
Mark Strand
Mina Loy
Louise Gluck
Amy Lowell
Sappho
Louise Erdrich
Wang Wei

It’s the kind of list that makes any selection of five names unwieldy as an indicator of whom Lenny might choose as a follow-up.If you said to yourself, “Well, Lenny likes Mark Strand, Louise Gluck, Louise Erdrich, Tess Gallagher, and Amy Lowell, there’s not chance you would spontaneously say, “Oh, yeah, I bet Ray Di Palma is waiting on deck.” Or if you named Anna Akhmatova, Paul Eluard, Edna St. Vincent Millay, Mina Loy, and Wendell Berry, would you immediately anticipate Gu Cheng, whose “Farewell” poem is heartbreakingly poignant?

Happy Solstice, Lenny! And thank you for continuing to inspire me.

January 20, 2025: The Gerrymandered Election of President Trump; Vice President Biden

BREAKING NEWS
After I posted this blog entry this morning, the Colorado State Supreme Court issued a ruling that Trump is ineligible for the GOP Primary ballot in Colorado. The case will now move to the Supreme Court of the United States, which has three judges appointed by Trump.

Weather Forecast: Donald Trump, Jr. takes up his father’s mantle and the GOP convention becomes the most chaotic affair since the Democrats met in Chicago in 1968.

The Original Constitution: The Gerrymandering of Taxation*

The odds are hardly worth risking even $10, let alone a hundred or a thousand dollars. Still, I’ll wager two dollars, or even as much as five, that we could have a national election in November, 2024 that ends up with the House of Representatives selecting Donald Trump as the next president, and the Senate choosing Joseph Biden as vice-president.

Such an outcome, of course, would reflect the gerrymandering that took place when the Constitution was first consented to by the original 13 states. The Electoral College, after all, was an attempt to balance unequal increments of power with the result that those states with the larger populations agreed to a social policy that blatantly violated the principle of “no taxation without representation.” If no candidate wins 270 or more electoral college votes, the election goes to Congress.The House (with each state’s ensemble of representatives getting one vote each) selects the president, and the Senate choose the vice-president.

The egregious disparity that would lead to such an outcome as President Trump and VP Biden is the result of an electoral arrangement in which almost 40,000,000 people in California will contribute infinitely more in taxes to the federal government than states with less than a million residents — and yet — and yet — and yet (it’s that unbelievable) get only ONE vote for President in the House of Representatives, while Wyoming and North Dakota and South Dakota will garner THREE votes. That’s a total of two and a quarter million people having a three to one advantage over tens of millions. If you added Idaho to this tabulation, you would have four states having one vote each for the president and California only having one: an almost ten to one discrepancy in deciding whether the United States becomes a dictatorship.

North and South Dakota, and Wyoming and Idaho — Four votes in the House of Representatives for President
California – one vote

If that isn’t massive gerrymandering in which people are being taxed outrageously out of proportion to their political power, then how extreme would it have to be for that term to be invoked?

Cue Boy George’v voice:Trauma Trauma Trauma Trauma Trauma machivellian

*(For historical background, see https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R40504.pdf)

************

The AIOSEO Score for the above blog post is 62 out of 100. Apparently, I have violated the rules that help a blog post attract readers. At the top of the list of these rules is “avoid using complex words.” I am advised to “(d)umb down your content to make your content easier to understand for all readers.” Dumbing down is exactly what fascism does.

Democracy, following their rules, would need a new spelling:
Dumb-mock-racy

The second rule that this system offers as advice for increasing readership is to use “easy to understand and short sentences.” This advice reflects the “Trump Effect” in which the style of his tweets is seen as effective communication and is therefore a model for all writers.

Sigh.

*********

Post-Script:

What is amazing to me is how the commentary on the ruling of the Colorado State Supreme Court indulges in the fantasy that the popular vote should determine whether Trump deserves to become president again.

Example: Adam Liptak wrote:
“Donald Trump is accused of doing grave wrongs in trying to overturn the election. But who should decide the consequences of that? Should it be nine people in Washington, or should it be the electorate of the United States, which can, for itself, assess whether Trump’s conduct is so blameworthy that he should not have the opportunity to serve another term?”

Dear Mr. Liptak: By “electorate,” you are covering over what really happens in American presidential elections. Al Gore and Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. They lost the election. An assessment was made about the qualifications of the candidates in 2000 and 2016 in which Bush and Trump were not the popular choices. Nevertheless, those two men were imposed on those who vote for Gore and Clinton.

THe decision of whether to shift the government of the United States from a representative republic to an authoritarian system should be done by a direct, popular vote, not by an electoral college that is effectively a version of taxation without proportionate representation.

Liptak is not alone is dissembling. The New York Times carried brief excerpts from two other writers who are also engaged in deceiving people as to what is involved in the “election” of the next president.

Michael Mukasey has argued in The Wall Street Journal that the provision doesn’t apply to Trump. “If Mr. Trump is to be kept from office, it will have to be done the old-fashioned way, the way it was done in 2020 — by defeating him in an election.”

“Section 3 of the 14th Amendment should not be used to prevent Americans from voting to elect the candidate of their choice. The best outcome, for the court and the country, would be for a unanimous court … to clear the way for Trump to run,” Ruth Marcus writes in The Washington Post.

Along with Liptak, Marcus is selling people an illusion of power in which all voters are equal. In point of fact, the voters of California will not get to choose their president The voters of Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Idaho will instead by the ones who disproportionately control the Electoral College’s choice. To pretend otherwise is to deny a ground-level reality.

Comic Palimpsests: The Return (aka “Retribution”) of Spiro Agnew

“I’ll get even with all those people who chanted, “Spiro, Spiro, you’re such a zero.”

Whatever vinyl comedy record had that satirical barb of the then vice-president, Spiro Agnew, long ago found its way to some used record store. I certainly don’t remember which comedian might have mincingly uttered that line. There were several comedians whose political material was released on albums in the early 1970s, and perhaps I could track down my epigraph if I had the time and money. I have located a starting point in an on-line article about recorded political comedy during Nixon’s Reign of Error:

The Five: Five Albums That Tried to Destroy Richard Nixon

In looking back at the past eight years, I’m surprised at how little commentary has focused on the parallels between another current presidential candidate who has promised “retribution” and the political demagoguery of Spiro Agnew. While Roy Cohen was an early mentor of Donald Trump, Cohen was not a social climber whose goal was being publicly fawned over by an adoring public. Trump on the other hand, could not have as a young man not noticed how effective taunting language is in gaining an audience that is waiting for the right person to elect as dictator.

Agnew had the additional disadvantage of looking like a “pol.” He had even less sense of sartorial style than Richard Nixon. Now I’m not claiming that Trump was already thinking of running for political office when he was in his mid-20s. How could he not have compared himself to someone like Agnew and quickly concluded that if someone as bland as Agnew could get serious mileage out of “nattering nabobs of negativity,” how much more could he attain, given that young Donald saw himself as full of the “rip” of wealth and looks?

It’s a grim situation. What kind of choice is it when one is asked for vote for either for the father of Hunter Biden or the father of Erik Trump?

Is this the only choice this nation has in voting for a first family? I’ve never written the word before in my blog, but “dispirited” is the only thing that comes to mind.

A Roster of L.A. Poetry Magazines (1948-2023)

Literary Magazines in Los Angeles or adjacent counties (1948-2023)

Line (three issues published in the late 1940s)
Variegation (Grover Jacoby, Jr.)
Recurrence (Grover Jacoby, Jr.)
California Quarterly (Tom McGrath)
Coastlines (Gene Frumkin; Mel Weisburd; Alexandra Garrett)
Trace (James Boyer May)
Ante (1964-1968)
Nomad (Don Factor; Anthony Link)
Beyond Baroque (New; Newletters; Magazine) — George Drury Smith, et al. (James Krusoe; Lynn Shoemaker)
Laugh Literary (Charles Bukowski)
Invisible City (Paul Vangelisti;John McBride)
Sunset Palms Hotel (Michael C. Ford)
Bachy (John Harris; Leland Hickman)
Momentum (Bill Mohr)
Intermedia (Harley W. LOND)
Electrum (Roger Suva)
Third Rail (Uri Hertz; Doren Robbins)
Rara Avis (Aleida Rodriguez; Jacqueline De Angelis)
NeWorld (Inner City Cultural Center)
Chrysalis (Woman’s Building)
CQ: California State Poetry Quarterly. 1972 – 2020. Between 1976-1980, edited in Los Angeles by Kenneth Atchity)
Nausea/Maelstrom Review (Leo Mailman)
Urthkin (Larry Ziman)
Con Safos ( https://repository.library.csuci.edu/handle/10139/2523 )
ChismeArte (Manazar Gamboa; Guillermo Bejarano)
Little Caesar (Dennis Cooper)
Barney (Jack Skelley)
Snap (Amy Gerstler and Lori Cohen)
Asylum (Greg Boyd)
Marilyn (Peter Schneidre)
Pearl (Joan Jobe Smith; Barbara Hauk; Marilyn Johnson)
Boxcar (Leland Hickman; Paul Vangelisti)
Sulfur (Clayton Eshleman)
Temblor (Leland Hickman)
The Human Review (Rick Bursky, editor; Will Slattery, contributing editor)
Santa Monica Review (James Krusoe; founding editor; Anthony Tonkovich)
Bakunin (Jordan Jones)
Blue Satellite (Amelie Frank and Matthew Niblock)
Tsunami (Lee Rossi)
Saturday Afternoon Journal
Blue Window
Poetry L.A. (Helen Friedland)
ONTHEBUS (Jack Grapes, Michael Andrews)
Arshile (Mark Salerno)
Caffeine (Rob Cohen)
Ribot (Paul Vangelisti)
New Review of Literature (Paul Vangelisti)
OR (Paul Vangelisiti; Otis College of Art and Design)
Parrot (Matthew Timmons)
Shattersheet (April and Jim Burns)
The Moment (S.A. Griffin)
Sic (Vice and Verse) — (S.A. Griffin; R.J. Alvarado)
Spillway (Marsha de la O; Phil Taggart)
Lummox (R.D. Armstrong)
Lana Turner (Cal Bedient and David Lau)
The Los Angeles Review (Kate Gale, Founding Editor)
Pool (Patty Seyburn; Judith Taylor)
Caliban (on-line) (Lawrence R. Smith)
Los Angeles Review (Red Hen Press; Kate Gale)
sin cesar (drylands) — (founded, 2015)
Website: https://drylandla.wordpress.com/
Cultural Weekly; Cultural Daily (Alexis Rhone Fancher, Poetry Editor)
Rattle (Timothy Green)

WEBZINES:
HINCHAS DE POESIA — Website: http://www.hinchasdepoesia.com/wp/
THE OFFING

There have been other poetry editors at work, of course. Deborah Drooz was the poetry editor at the L.A. Weekly in the late 1980s, for instance.

It should also be noted that there were other editors working on magazines published outside of Los Angeles. Jean Burgen, for instance, editoed Yankee magazine for several decades.

Finally, many colleges in Southern California have published on a regular basis a literary magazine. CSU Long Beach (RipRap); Cal State L.A. (Statement); UCLA (Jacaranda Review); CUC Irvine (Faultline); etc.

Aya Tarlow was the editor, I believe, of Matrix: For She of the New Aeon.

Where were you when…… Michael Bishop (1945-2023)

Tuesday, December 12, 2023: Post-script to Dec. 10

I don’t think many people read my post two days about the level of gun violence in this country; but having heard when I got home from work that Michael Bishop has died one day after his 78th birthday, I certainly can’t call attention to the passing of this very accomplished and noteworthy writer without mentioning how his wife and he lost their son, James, in the massacre at Virginia Tech.

Where were you when you finally realized how non-exempt all of us are from having something as horrendous as this happen to the ones we care about the most?

After I posted my entry, by the way, I picked up the Sunday New York Times. Guess what was on the front page? “Unless a gun be born again, verily, verily, I say unto you that it will not be able to send people to the Kingdom of Heaven.”

Christopher James Bishop was not the only one who perished at Virginia Tech. Let us not think that a decade and a half has mitigated in any way the pain of all those losses.

https://www.weremember.vt.edu/biographies/turner.html

Sunday, December 10, 2023

Where were you when you heard that Bobby Kennedy had been shot?

Where were you when you heard that the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. had been shot?

Where were you when you heard that John Lennon had been shot?

Where were you when you heard that the Challenger had blown up?

Where aere you when you realized how few people living within a radius of one mile of your residence could answer all those questions?

Where were you when you first heard your favorite song by your favorite band?

Where were you when you heard about a specific mass killing, other than 9/11?

For instance, on June 7, 2013, a shooter killed five people and injured three others in Santa Monica, California. An on-line description asserts that “the shooting spree occurred throughout Santa Monica, California, ending at the Santa Monica College Campus.” Actually, it did not occur “throughout” Santa Monica. It began in a neighborhood just across the street from the Santa Monica campus, which is located on Pico Boulevard.

I had lived in that neighborhood, in a small cottage, in 1971. Over 40 years later, I found myself near mid-day returning from a protest rally on San Vicente Blvd. We had wanted the President’s motorcade to take note of the fact that not everyone had forgotten about the “endless war.”

It turned out that the war was more nearby than we thought, which is to say that another “gun for hire” — another sniper volunteering for duty on behalf of the gun manufacturers — was about to get to work. I was just ten minutes into my drive home and approaching Pico on Cloverfield when traffic suddenly stalled. it wasn’t budging at all. I looked at the time and thought, “I know this neighborhood. If I make a right turn here, I can cut around this.” But I decided not to. Good thing, because the street I was planning to zig-zag my way around on was the street a man was about to commence killing several people. The shooting had not yet started as I crossed Pico Blvd. and headed to Ocean Park Blvd. and from there to Lincoln Blvd. and then a 20 minute cruise to Marina del Rey and its freeway onramp. Later, when I got home, I learned of how close a call that moment in stalled traffic had been.

A year later, on May 23, 2014, I was in Mexico City to give a poetry reading. I was sitting in a restaurant eating some breakfast when the television began reporting news of a mass killing in Isla Vista, California. I had been warned by CSULB officials that going to Mexico City might be dangerous. “Yeah,” I remember thinking to myself, “I should have gone to Santa Barbara instead. That would have been playing it safe.”

And then there was the mass killing less than a quarter mile from my residence a couple years ago. On Tuesday, October 29th, 2019, I drove home from the campus and had to park on East Seventh Street. All of the parking spots on the “safe” side of my neighborhood’s street sweeping routine for the next day were already taken, except on Seventh Street. The next day I heard that three people had been killed that night at a party within 200 feet of where I parked. A gang had targeted the wrong house. None of the people killed were part of any gang.

Nor could any of them could have answered the first four questions at the start of today’s post. Very young lives, all obliterated by cruel ignorance.

Once again, I think of the poem by Brecht that I recently quoted in this blog, and the context of that quotation.

**********

Whom should I fear?

Since the day that John Lennon was murdered, well over a half-million people in the United States have been murdered by guns. This figure does NOT include those who killed themselves with guns. The murders of over a half-million people were perpetrated by callous agents who took advantage of the massive availability of guns in this country. This access is facilitated at the behest of the National Rifle Association, an organization whose members overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump not once, but twice, and are eager to vote a third time for him.

Less than 4000 Americans have been killed in terrorist attacks in that same period, and that includes those who were brutally slaughtered by Hamas in Israel two months ago.

Whom should I fear more?

In looking at the extremely disproportionate numbers between victims of terrorist organizations and those murdered by guns, one wonders if Homeland Security should have a certain gun lobby group classified as deserving their own special place in their registry.

The half-million figure, by the way, includes those at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas who were murdered on December 6, 2023. The killer had a list of those he intended to target, but the victims were not on the list. Now while the specific motive for Anthony Polito’s rampage is still not known, my guess is that he had a fantasy of living in his favorite city and working at the local university as a way to support himself. When his job application didn’t yield any adjunct work, he imploded, but the chaos he unleashed might not have been as random as it first seemed. Let us note that two of the people whom he murdered were people of color: Dr. Patricia Navarro-Velez and Dr. Cha Jan “Jerry” Chang. Is it a coincidence that two of the people he “spontaneously” chose to shoot were professors from communities of color? I think not. Having primed himself for “retribution,” he saw their skin color and opened fire. White privilege, once again indulging in criminal self-pity, reveals the seething ego that can’t accept the slow erosion of its hegemony.

*******

We live in a state of civil war embedded in an ongoing constitutional crisis that has too long gone unacknowledged. The constitutional crisis involves far more than the second amendment. At the core of this crisis is the originary tension between taxation and representation.

One hears “chatter” about how a civil war might break out if one political faction or another wins or loses the next election.

Stop speculating about some possible event.

If the death figures cited above don’t make you realize that we are in a state of civil war right now, then the death toll will never slow down.

I am an unarmed citizen in this country. My “civilian” status does not exempt me from being the next victim of a rapacious agenda being enforced by those who supply weapons used in this guerilla-style conflict.

“If my luck deserts me, I am lost.”

Magra Press Reading — featuring Ronk; Phillips; Lloyd; Burns; and Mohr

SUNDAY, DECEMBER 10
5:00 p.m.
Magra Press Reading
at North Figueroa Bookstore

The past four months have provided me with a chance to be part of more poetry readings than the previous three years combined. Subsequent to reading at the Los Angeles Downtown Public Library, in Augusst, in an event organized by Lynne Thompson, I read at Page Against the Machine twice (once with Fred Voss, and another for BEAT NOT BEAT); Dizzy on Vinyl Record Store; the Sacramento Poetry Center; and the Davis Poetry Reading Series curated by Dr. Andy Jones. Richard Modiano also interviewed me for KPFK, and I gave a talk at PAMLA in Portland.

To wrap up all this touring, please join me at North Figueroa Bookshop, Sunday afternoon, December 10 at 5pm., to celebrate
Magra Books 2023 publications. Magra will feature Lorenzo Mari’s Cancellations, Bill Mohr’s
Displacements and Amy Allara’s Eight, with in-person readings and book signings by Mohr,
and Magra author’s Avery Burns, David Lloyd, Dennis Phillips and Martha Ronk also featured.
Magra Books editors Sean Pessin and Paul Vangelisti will be on hand to introduce and discuss
their project.

For more information about Magra Books, visit www.magrabooks.com.

North Figueroa Bookshop is located in Highland Park at 6040 North Figueroa Street.
Admission is free but seating is limited. Accessible entrance is around the corner through the
parking lot. North Figueroa Bookshop does not have parking for customers, but there is street
parking available around Highland Park Pool and the Arroyo Seco Library..

At the website for Magra Books, you can also find a tile to click on for Episode 6 of Magra Radio:
“The Aging Comedian as Letter N” by Bill Mohr.

Medical Doctors’ Refusal to be Subordinated: Call Karl Marx to the Witness Stand

In my last post, I commented on the relationship between insurance companies and those who need medical care.

But what about those who provide that care? Are they not exploited, too?

Yes, and a few of them are beginning to understand the actual nature of their relationship with their employer.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-doctors-pharmacists-revolt-124803914.html

While the entire article is worth reading, take special note of the following comment:
“For years, many doctors and pharmacists believed that they stood largely outside the traditional management-labor hierarchy. Now they feel smothered by it. The result is a growing worker consciousness among people who haven’t always exhibited one — a sense that they are subordinates constantly at odds with their overseers”
.
Ha! This is hardly a surprise. One hundred and seventy five years ago, Karl Marx wrote in the opening chapter of “The Communist Manifesto” that “The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers.”

Perhaps someday the faculty at CSU will be on strike as the same time as physicians. Doctors of Philosophy and Doctors of the Body …. at one in saying the system must yield and make our lives more viable.

The Analogy Quiz of HMO Health Care

A simple analogy quiz today:

Health Insurance is to Medical Care

as

Marriage is to ___________:

A.) connubial bliss at least once a day
B.) constant, lingering caresses
C.) daily, joyful flirtation with one’s soul mate
D.) Celibacy

If you chose “D,” you are correct.

Health insurance only means that you are paying for the “privilege” of having that specific status. It does not mean that you are entitled to medical care. It only means that you are theoretically eligible for medical care.

Just as a spouse can legally deny intimate access of their body to another spouse, a health insurance company can deny (and DOES deny, on a constant basis) prompt access to medical care.

“Denial of benefits” is likely to lead to a divorce court in the case of a marriage.

In the United States, however, HMO denial of benefits is imposed on those who pay for it without any possible recourse. There is no way to divorce oneself from a medical system that subjects a person to the constant violation of their dignity by forestalling medical treatment.

One of the Bob Dylan’s lines is “Is there a hole for me to get sick in?”

That about sums it up, wouldn’t you say?

**********

In case anyone is wondering, “Well, why don’t people file a complaint?”

Ha! Ha! Ha!

Don’t you understand that all you will get back is a form letter with boilerplate language about how the provider (be is Blue Shield or Kaiser) appreciates your evaluation of service and that it will take into account your comments as it works to improve its service?

Translation: We treated you badly and we got away with it. There was no penalty. No one investigated us. No fines were levied. Therefore, we continue to establish and refinforce the bottom line of how little service we can give and face no repercussions whatsoever. A complaint only helps the corporation give even worse service, since they learn how much they can get away with, with complete impunity.

“The Masters of War” are also the Chancellors of Health Care.

************************

Finally, if you believe this is just some isolated crank who sees health care as his chosen conspiracy theory, I would suggest you consult an article by a journalism enterprise that takes the truth seriously:

https://www.propublica.org/article/health-insurance-denials-breaking-state-laws

Insurance companies willfully and knowingly break the law. At the very least, they do not hesitate to violate the dignity and well-being of those whose labor has earned the right to access to health care.