Category Archives: Performance

Music Performance Poetry

“Round About Midnite” — Stuart Z. Perkoff at LACMA

Saturday, October 4, 2014

I gave a talk this past summer at LACMA along with George Drury Smith that was part of the programming associated with the exhibit of a mural from the Venice Post Office. As that exhibit comes to a close, LACMA has decided to celebrate the Venice West scene with a staging of Stuart Z. Perkoff’s “Round About Midnite,” which was last publicly presented in Venice in 1960. It will be a staged reading with live jazz music by the Eric Reed Trio. For those interested in reading about the Venice West scene, I recommend John Maynard’s Venice West as well as the chapter on that portion of the Los Angeles poetry renaissance in my book, Holdouts (University of Iowa Press, 2011).

 

The California Beat Scene: The Eric Reed Trio

and Stuart Z. Perkoff’s Round about Midnite

Saturday, October 11, 2014

 2:00 pm

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART

 BING THEATER

 Free and open to the public
 Note: Doors open at 1:30 pm

Bill Mohr—noted L.A.-based poet, professor at California State University, Long Beach, and a top authority on Los Angeles poetry—introduces the verse play.

Stuart Perkoff’s poetry appeared in Donald Allen’s classic anthology, The New American Poetry (Grove Press, 1960) as well as several anthologies edited by Paul Vangelisti. Eric Reed has long been known as one the best jazz pianists working today. This is the first appearance at LACMA of the Eric Reed Trio.

 

 

 

Ground Level Conditions Performance Poetry

The Search Engine Generation

Saturday, August 2, 2014

The Search Engine Generation

 In the past 15 years, e-mail has become the normative means of instant commercial and personal communication, and social media such as My Space, Facebook, and Twitter have aligned themselves with YouTube as the prime means of generating and accessing personal identity. All of these mechanisms are embedded within the data gathering combines of various corporate agencies and governmental vacuum machines. The unprecedented scale of this information shift has not (as far I can tell) generated any term to describe the coming-of-age youth who have been born since Bill Clinton was first elected president. These young people both generate source code and have lived their entire lives enmeshed in the uroboros-like labyrinth of source code.

An earlier generation (those born in the 1970s) got tagged with the term “Gen X,” which became popular enough as a rubric that almost everyone knew soon after its appearance to whom it was referring. A similar naming process, however, does not seem to have occurred for a subsequent generation. About three years ago, I was standing in line somewhere and suddenly the phrase ‘The Search Engine Generation” echoed in my thoughts. It felt as if someone not visible to me or anyone else had suddenly whispered to me, in the same way that a colleague will comment on something at a public meeting. It made sense to me and I’ve subsequently talked about the term with various strangers I’ve met at airports and conventions over the past couple years. As far as I can tell, the phrase has not gained any traction, and I doubt that posting it here will affect its neutral standing. Nevertheless, as a way to contextualizing the writing of Matthew Dickman and some other younger poets in a future post, I want to post this term as the best way I’ve been able to characterize the impetus behind the enormous social shifts that are taking place in our cultural and economic lives. My choice of a technological mechanism in some ways should not be that surprising. “Print culture,” for instance, is the term used to bracket the impact that the printing press had on the development of the modern world. The imprint of next half-millennium will be derived from the emergence of the search engine as the fundamental synapse of post-modern life in its post-chrysalis life.

The first time I heard the term “search engine” used by anyone engaged in cultural critique was during a seminar at UCSD in the spring of 1999. Marcel Henaff, one of my three or four favorite professors in the Department Literature, was talking about how he was the first person in the department ever to send an e-mail and during the course of his talk he mentioned the term, “search engine.” “Search engine?” I thought to myself. “What’s a search engine?” Obviously, I was still working at the level of a print-culture typesetter, who regarded his Compugraphic 7500 as sophisticated because it made use of a floppy disc to store information. Fundamentally, I was still functioning as a person shaped by a Fordist economy. As I puzzled over Professor Henaff’s citation of “search engines” as a paradigmatic shift, my limited imagination remained unable to comprehend an engine as anything other than a mechanism in which the energy results in visibly moving parts. I still don’t have a sense that the results of typing of a term into my web browser involve an engine. Nevertheless, I can’t imagine my life the past 15 years as anything other than one in which search engines have enabled me to keep track of far more projects than I could previously have handled. On the other hand, I still feel emotionally embedded in print culture and only recently have I realized that I no longer find myself wistfully thinking of entrances to libraries as places where rows of wooden drawers with paper card catalogues await my perusal. The visual joke of the card catalogue erupting in Ghostbusters will only be a puzzling prank to a new generation of film watchers.

At this point, anyone who is twenty to 25 years ago has basically been as shaped in a social sense by search engines as much as my generation was shaped by radio, television, cinema, and vinyl records. If social identity the past four centuries has largely been a plastic phenomenon, in which one performs in public space some consistent model of inclinations and preferences, it now involves an intense degree of constant reinvention, all of which is both he subject and object of search engines. The pressure to provide new “content” for these search engines seems voracious, and some of that pressure seems to have surfaced in the development of newly prominent poets. In particular, I am interested in how the overflow of information seems to have reduced the need to be held accountable for what one says. Instead, as with social media, success in being visible is justification enough for one’s artistic production. The result is an image of the poet as an “air personality” or “court jester” to the powers that control search engines. No one poet is guilty of falling into this trap, and future posts are not meant to assign responsibility for this problem to a particular poet as such. I have to start somewhere, though, and at this point it appears that Matthew Dickman is a likely candidate for cross-examination.

 

 

 

Music Performance Poetry

Idyllwild Poetry and Jazz – Summer, 2014

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Idyllwild Poetry Festival: “What to do with the rest of your life”

The poetry week at Idyllwild in the summer, 2014 held its first reading last night in the Parks Exhibition Center. Ed Skoog led off with a long poem about taking a shower at night that seemed somewhat akin to another of his poem that was recently published in American Poetry Review. In “Being in Plays,” Skoog invokes the “foldable theater / half-constructed on page or mind” that is plastic enough to enfold itself with “the unseen,” implicitly half-visible to him in the poem’s lyric silence. The poem about taking a shower at night, however, is much more ambitious than “Being in Plays” and towards the end began to rise to the dramaturgic challenge posed by Wallace Stevens in “Of Modern Poetry.”

Because the gallery was going to hold an opening at 8:00 p.m., the reading had an hour time limit, and Skoog very generously allotted the bulk of the time to his two featured poets, Troy Jollimore and Ellen Bass. Jollimore focused on poems he had recently written, which immediately earned my admiration. It’s all too tempting for a poet to view a reading as an opportunity to impress the audience with one’s best efforts, and sometimes such a reading is appropriate, but Jollimore seemed to trust both his work-in-progress and the occasion of a new audience in a remote, small town as fully compatible.  Of the half-dozen or so poems he read, my favorites were “On the Origins of Things” and “Marvelous Things without Number.”

Ellen Bass read about the same amount of time, though she focused on published poems from her most recent collection, Like a Beggar.  She led off with that book’s first poem, “Relax,” followed by “Padre Hotel,” “The Morning After” and the evening’s most immediately memorable poem, “What Did I Love,” an extended meditation on being held accountable for the meat you eat by being willing to execute it. Bass is an exceptionally fine reader, and her voice embodied the subtle cadences and rhythms propelling her imagistic rhetoric.

 

The best moment of the evening was yet to come. On her suggestion, Linda and I walked over to Bowman Auditorium for a jazz presentation. We walked in while someone was concluding a number that featured a meditation on John Lennon’s “Norwegian Wood.” Then Marshall Hawkins slowly strode across the stage and took up an enormous upright bass, upon which he began to stroke his bow for the opening moments of a composition entitled “What to Do With the Rest of Your Life.” When I opened my eyes after listening intently to the first 30 seconds or so, I kept looking for the horn. But no one was playing a horn. It was Hawkins, deftly coaxing the strings of the upright into a plangent spindrift of suspended yearning. I don’t have any idea of how he managed to transform his instrument from string to brass, but he did. I have heard Hawkins perform several times over the past 15 years when I was on the main amphitheater stage at Idyllwild for the festival, back when it was impeccably run by Cecilia Woloch. Hawkins is one of the master artists of our time, and I doubt a moment of equally fierce tenderness was offered to any audience on the West Coast last night. It was a privilege to hear him still sharing his vision at the heights of his undiminished powers.

 

 

Books Ground Level Conditions Performance Poetry

The Great California Drought, Notwithstanding

Friday, July 4, 2014

The Great California Drought, Notwithstanding:

Hen House Records, MC Ford, and Bob Peters

The Great California drought of the second decade of the twenty-first century has the potential to be “The Big One” that shakes the state to its core. Although small-scale earthquakes seem to be occurring with increasing frequency in the past 12 months, and “The Big One” (as measured on the Richter scale) is well overdue at this point, this drought is not a disaster subject to fantasized deferral. Unfortunately, the Governor’s call for a voluntary water reduction of twenty percent apparently fell far short of that parsimonious ideal, in part because California’s residents already consciously began to constrain their water usage at the start of this decade. Such casual efforts, however gratifying as they might be in demonstrating civic allegiance, are not going to be sufficient in resolving this crisis, which now ranks as “exceptional” for well over a third of the entire state on the U.S. Drought Monitor map

The lack of water is especially pronounced in Idyllwild, which I drove up to this past weekend to teach at the high school summer arts camp again. Idyllwild depends completely on whatever water is in storage on the mountain itself. Nothing is piped in from elsewhere. Although the sparse rainfall of the past couple years certainly contributed to the ferocity of the fires that forced an evacuation last summer, the surviving forest has still managed to retained a fairly green radiance. Some of that may be due to the astonishing persistence of summer storm patterns in these mountains. Last summer’s major fire was in large part put to rest by a fairly heavy storm that arrived just at the right moment. This afternoon, a 15 minute rainstorm was followed by a moderately steady downpour for about twenty minutes. I doubt the total precipitation was more than an eighth of an inch, but it was most welcome.

Last Friday, before heading up here, Linda and I attended a record release party for Michael C. Ford’s Look into each other’s ears. Harlan Steinberger, the producer and impresario behind Hen House Studios in Venice, made use of his new facilities in Venice to host one of the most impressive gatherings of poets on a single evening outside of any formal literary event in recent years. Everyone was delighted to see Michael’s remarkable blend of cultural skepticism and wistful irony still finding wide-spread support.

Perhaps the evening’s most delightful surprise was the presence of Paul Trachtenberg, the surviving spouse of the late Bob Peters. I had exchanged a few notes with Paul since learning of Bob’s death, and while Paul sounded in his messages, both to me and others on Facebook as if a kind of rare solace had taken possession and drenched his inner self with equanimity, I hardly expected him to be at Harlan and Michael’s party. Seeing Paul reminded me of his request that we remember and celebrate Bob’s life not in a public gathering, but in the privacy of our own reading. Get one of his books from your shelf, he urged us, and read a favorite poem.

For the past several days, I have been intermittently dipping into Gauguin’s Chair, a volume of selected poems from his first years as a poet. The title page reads “1967-1974,” but this refers more to the publication dates of the books from which the poems are drawn. (For reasons of sentiment, perhaps, the original sales slip is still in the book: 5-18-80. 4.95 plus 30 cents tax, purchased from A Different Light Bookstore: Gay Literature/Periodicals/Aesthetera. 4014 Santa Monica Blvd. (at Sunset), Hollywood, CA 90029 (213) 668-0629).

In an interview conducted by Billy Collins in April, 1974 (when Collins was a grad student at UC Riverside), Peters talked about how the sound of words is the primal attraction of poetry. “I keep saying ear when I talk about poets. I may perhaps be too attuned to sound. I luxuriate in splendid sounds in poems, my own as well as other people’s.” Peters had the rare ability to intermingle “splendid sounds” with a wide range of subject matter, including historical subjects such as Ann Lee of the Shakers or King Ludwig of Bavaria.

Peters began his creative career at a relatively late point in his life. The sudden death of his son, Richard, on February 10, 1960, at the age of four and a half, left Peters unable to derive sufficient meaning from his life as a professor of literature, and he began writing poems, many of which addressed the cauterizing loss of his child due to a one-day illness. These poems eventually were collected in Songs for a Son. As an example of the pleasure he took in “splendid sounds,” let us savor nine lines from a poem in that first book, “Transformation”:

Between death’s

hot coppery sides

the slime of birth

becomes a chalky

track of bone

compressed in time

to slate, or gneiss,

or marble – pressed

lifeless into stone.

 

The overall pattern of iambic dimeter is remarked upon in a fine instance of metapoetry: “compressed in time” refers not just to the brevity of the son’s journey in life, but to the constricted metamorphosis enacted as “compressed” becomes “pressed” in the stanza’s penultimate line. The layered internal rhyme of gneiss and lifeless provides the solemn intonation that completes the move from slime to stone. Splendid concatenation, indeed!

As the kind of memorial requested by Paul, though, and since I am in mountains now, at 5,000 feet, I have decided to share with you a poem by Bob that is rarely (if ever) reprinted in anthologies. Here is part eight of “Mt. San Gorgonio Ascent”:

At a drop below

hangs a cloud, mercurial.

The mountain it claims

gloats green, lung-red, and blue.

Pines flare. Boulders

glow. Light falls

Total mountain,

total drift of mist,

of flesh. The trance

is my own.

 

My hand is a peach

attached to a limb

swung over a gorge.

It hangs beyond all reach

gathers ripeness in.

 

Ichor swells the vein,

proceeds to the nipple end.

A bee strikes, hovers over.

Dance Performance

“Evening Soul” and “Shadow Play”

Saturday, April 26, 2012

A couple weeks ago, I picked an envelope as my “raffle prize” at the end of faculty meeting; it contained a pair of free tickets to a dance concert at CSULB. The Dance Department is celebrating the 20th anniversary celebration of the campus’s performance space for dance, which is formally named the Martha B. Knoebel Dance Theater. While I have frequently walked or drive past the Knoebel Theater many times in the past eight years, Linda and had never attended any performance there. The interior of the Knoebel Theater turned out to be one of the best designed small theaters I’ve ever seen. It holds around 250 people and every seat in the house seemed to have an acute sense of its linearity to the stage.

Linda and I ended up sitting in the back row, next to a young dancer who had performed in an earlier version of the first work of the second half of the program, Lorin Johnson’s “Shadow Play.” Johnson included a note in the program in which he acknowledged the contributions the dancers had made to the choreography of this piece, and in the brief interlude between “Shadow Play” and the next piece, Linda and I quietly asked the young dancer, who will soon be moving to Dallas, about the difference between the 2009 staging and the current production; she described the previous version as having more solo dancing and duets. I would love to have a chance to see both versions, but my hunch is that this new version is a significant point in the work’s maturation. “Shadow Play” is an extraordinary piece of dance; I confess that I would rather have seen it danced again immediately last night than see the rest of the second half. Johnson’s piece deserves widespread attention: it had the deftness of a chess master fully attuned to the sensuality of symbolic space. The eight dancers, half in white costumes like ever so slightly tarnished cream, and the other half in resplendent black, interwove and dispersed in a thoughtful frolic. The subatomic fields of the life force can operate only because their surfaces are so inaccessible. How rare, therefore, is it that what can find no equivalent in representation somehow aligned itself in this work with an outpouring of visible comprehension. The generosity of the collaborative genesis must certainly be largely responsible for this effect.

The only other piece in the evening that came close to Johnson’s was the late Susan McLain’s “Evening Soul,” which I equally enjoyed, though the transitional moment in which the dancers moved the chairs to the rear of the stage left me yearning for some magical hand to slide them back while the dancers kept me suspended in their prolonged, gliding enchantment. The revival of this piece in no way seemed in debt to some kind of obligatory sentiment. If her memory is revered, it is because only an artist of the highest caliber could have choreographed such a vivid incarnation of solemn human consciousness in communal oscillation. The dancers in Andrew Vaca’s “General Education,” for instance, certainly had a nimble exuberance (or should I say exuberant nimbleness?), but it went no deeper than that. The profound inquiry of McLain’s “Evening Soul” accompanied Linda and me as we left the theater and fittingly found ourselves walking through a surprising sprinkle that later turned to light rain. I never met McLain, but both Linda and I will remain in her debt for the gifts of her vision.

 

 

 

Performance Theater

The Ghost Sonata

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

The Ghost Sonata is currently being staged in a workshop production at the Actors’ Gang in Culver City and will be up for one more weekend before the group takes Midsummer Nights Dream on a world tour. I read August Strindberg’s play back in the late 1960s and remember wondering back then if it were more a play for “self-broadcasting,,” a sort of a radio script for one’s private transmission. My recollection is that it was the kind of poetic nightmare that appealed to a young writer full of the inner turbulence that often marks a literary apprenticeship. This production, however, did little more than evoke a desire to read the play again in order to find out exactly how much this production verged in intent from Strindberg’s script. Mr. Brian Finney, the director, seemed to have little idea of how to bring the young student and the Hyacinth Girl into full awareness of each other’s predicaments. The acting was either “over” or “under” the tone needed to sustain characters, and none of it benefitted from the decision to “mike” the characters, which resulted in the first act seeming like a parody of “lip synch” performance.

On the whole, the acting was not as good as could be found at a MFA production at UCSD’s theater. I was surprised, in fact, by the pedestrian quality of the efforts. The best work was done by two young actresses who played the role of subordinate collaborators to Hummel, the vampire-like figure of The Ghost Sonata. When they became the horses who dragged Hummel’s wheelchair like a triumphant chariot in slow motion across the stage, the stage briefly glowed with a sense of genuine theatricality. The staging was not defiantly original at that moment, but at least it pulled theme and image into the vortex of the unpredictable. Even if one knew the script, it was hard to tell at that precise moment what might happen next, and the renewal of that uncertainty was exactly what more of this production needed. If it is to be revived during October as a play meant for the Halloween season, then the internal dynamics need more imaginative commitment. In particular, the castration motif needs serious reconsideration. Emasculating males by ripping rubberized facsimiles of genitals is superficial titillation at the level of juvenile pomposity. These instances made The Ghost Sonata seem closer to Alfred Jarry than Strindberg.

The musicians were perhaps the best part of the performance; their combination of percussion and accordion renditions of various tunes gave the production a hint of the tone poem that is at the heart of Strindberg’s play. Any play that they happened to be hired for would probably be worth attendance. Whether that play would have the kind of director and actors needed to give their duets the context they deserve is most likely no better than a 3 to 1 proposition.

 

Performance Poetry

Link to Audio for Poetry in the Windows VI

Monday, April 21, 2014

http://soundcloud.com/arroyo-arts-poets

On Saturday, April 19, the Arroyo Arts Collective held a Poetry in the Windows walk in which poets whose poems had been selected for display in store front windows walked up and down N. Figueroa Street and read their poems. Linda Hoag, a fine poet herself, has just sent me a link to the recordings of the poems that are imprinted into the corner of the posters for downloading.

In addition to my poem, “Scorpio in the Summer,” you can also hear poems by Linda Albertano, Lois P. Jones, Jenny Factor, Helene Cardona, Erika Ayon, Yvonne Estrada, Liz Gonzalez, Steve Kowit, Victoria Melekian, Ceci Peri, Marilyn Robertson, Candace Pearson, Sherman Pearl, Charles Harper Webb, Sonya Sones, Mary Torregrassa, Thom Cagle., and Charles Hood.

Treat yourself to a half-hour of auditory bliss. I heard many of these poems read outside such stores such as the Bird Man Pet (Store), Delicias Bakery, Quick’r Print’r, the Slow Culture Gallery, Highland Appliances, Folliero’s Pizza, and the Bearded Beagle. Appropriately enough, I read my poem on the sidewalk outside the Twinkletoes Dance Studio and I thank the owner for putting my poem in her window. I am hardly along in my gratitude; all the poets appreciate the storeowners who have helped make our poems visible as well as giving us a platform to make them audible.

Here’s the link:

http://soundcloud.com/arroyo-arts-poets

Performance Poetry

Beyond Baroque Reading

SATURDAY, APRIL 5, 2014

Bill Mohr and Rick Lupert

Beyond Baroque Literary Arts Center

681 Venice Blvd.

Venice, CA 90291

(301) 822-3006

FREE

This will be the first time I’ve ever read with Rick, who heads up poetrysuperhighway and the Cobalt Cafe Reading Series. I’m looking forward to the entire weekend.

The past month has been a whirlwind, starting with the trip to AWP convention in Seattle in late February and the first two days of March. Linda and I have attended several events at art galleries and the Autry Museum in what little time is left over from teaching and committee work. I have some partial entries typed up that I hope to insert in the coming weeks.

Onward!

 

Performance Theater

“Something has been broken….”

Edward Albee’s “The Goat or, Who Is Sylvia?” — February 23, 2014

The California Repertory Company is staging Edward Albee’s The Goat or, Who Is Sylvia?  at its Royal Stage on the Queen Mary in Long Beach for a three-week run. When the play was first staged a dozen years ago, no doubt a significant percentage of its audience in New York would have remembered that Rochelle Owens wrote a play called Futz in 1968. Albee seems to have included one allusion to Owens’s play in The Goat. Albee’s story focuses on the marriage of Martin, a world-famous architect, and Stevie, who learns from a letter from Martin’s best friend that her spouse has deviated from the herd of sexual normativity in order to take up with a barnyard animal, In explaining to his wife that he has made an effort to understand his compulsion, he describes going to a self-help meeting for those whose sexual preference is an animal. The leader is fucking a small young pig, according to Martin and it’s hard not to regard that detail as an allusion to Owens’s play.

While watching The Goat yesterday afternoon, however, with Linda and and Hye Sook, I  was reminded of a passage in The Zoo Story,  which came out years before Owens’s play.  In the monologue, “The Story of Jerry and the Dog,” Jerry describes to his auditor, Peter, this encounter with his landlady’s dog, whom he has unsuccessfully tried to murder with poisoned meat.

“The beast was there … looking at me. And, you know, he looked better for his scrape with the nevermind. I stopped; I looked at him; he looked at me. I think … I think we stayed a long time that way ….. But during that twenty seconds or two hours that we looked into each other’s face, we made contact. Now, here is what I had wanted to happen: I loved the dog now, and I wanted him to love me. …. ….”

In The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia? there is no love-hate relationship; rather, Martin claims to have a bond with a goat named Sylvia that equals if not surpasses the jouissance of Spenser’s Bower of Bliss. My point, though, is that this is not the first time that an off-stage animal has played a major role in one of his plays. In the mid-1970s, back when Century City had a very fine several hundred seat theater, I saw Albee’s Seascape, and my memory is that it involves an encounter between two human and a pair of large (human-scale) sentient lizards. I never read the play, but having seen The Goat, I am very eager to sit down with the script and to start considering what I can now learn about Albee’s use of animals as a dramatic trope. He was one of the half-dozen most important influences and inspirations in my youthful decision to start writing in a serious manner, and I have sadly neglected to keep his work as present in my thoughts as it deserves.

The production of The Goat or, Who Is Sylvia? is an above-average effort by a solid theatrical enterprise at the southernmost edge of Los Angeles County, despite the lack of a physical chemistry between the husband and wife. Both Roma Maffia and Brian Mulligan played their roles with thoughtful comprehension, but it was difficult to believe on a physical level that these two people would ever have fallen in love and managed to stay at the level of intimacy they claimed to have experienced during their marriage. Ms. Maffia was especially adept at picking up the comic jousts intertwined into the dissolution of a marriage through an extreme act of infidelity. When her shock gives way to grief, she was able to release the agony of mourning in a sequence of groans that turned the stage into a open grave for which there was no consolation. “Something has been broken that cannot be fixed,” she tells Martin, and though she tries to bury what been broken, the slaughtered goat she drags into their living room cannot ever be interred. Craig Anton’s portrayal of a best friend echoed Ibsen’s DNA to a remarkable degree, even in the final costume of a dark coat at the end of the play. I normally don’t notice costume design, but if anything hinted at the divergence of Stevie and Martin, it was the underlying warmth and coolness of their wardrobes. Stevie’s outfit bespoke a sensual passion, whereas Martin’s cut of cloth seemed to fit the methodical alignments required of an architect.

James Martin’s direction was commendable in its control of the play’s pacing, a far more difficult challenge that it might have seemed to the audience. Albee has always handled dialogue with a master’s gracefulness and any director who undertakes one of his plays had better come prepared for the need to calibrate his cast with vigilance. The one moment I would have liked to have seen worked on longer was the instant in which Roma smashed a painting by Martin’s mother through an easel. It was a rupture that could all too easily be coded as a punctum, and perhaps the brevity of the gesture’s ripples were meant to evoke the way a perfect diver glides through the surface of the water. If so, I still wanted to see the diver linger on the diving board thirty feet above the drowning pool.

Finally, my reflection on this performance would be at fault if I did not mention the winsome presence of a young actor who is still in the earliest stage of eventual multiplicity. Without any mannered sentiment whatsoever, Tyler Bremer’s performance as Billy evoked the inner turmoil of a young man willing to risk having told his parents that he is gay. Whether or not he has given permission to them to share that firm part of his still inchoate social identity with people outside his family is uncertain. (His father’s revelation of his son’s coming out to his best friend seems not to be held to the same standard of rectitude that Martin assails Ross for having violated.) Bremer’s portrayal of Billy superbly catches the travail that any young man must endure to break free of an ambivalence that almost any marriage can succumb to, even when the temptations are far less extraordinary than the betrayal depicted in The Goat.

Books Music Performance Poetry Theater

Ask Your Mama

February 20, 2014

The past several weeks have been very busy at school. This semester I am teaching a graduate seminar in 20th century American literature that I’ve never taught before, so I’ve been kept busier than usual in preparing for my classes. Linda and I have had the chance to eat out more often than usual, in part because a couple of good new restaurants have opened nearby. Portfolio Cafe at the corner of Junipero and Fourth Street most certainly be getting close to its 25th anniversary; it recently underwent a renovation that mainly seemed directed at shedding any image it might have of a 20th century coffeehouse. The rear area still retains its laid-back ambiance, but the front now seems to possess more of a Peet’s polish, though still having some measure of individuality. The storefronts next to Portfolio’s, which I read at back in 1993 with Harry Northup and Linda Albertano, had been vacant for almost two years, or so it seems, but very recently two restaurants have opened up, one featuring an Argentinian menu and the other specializing in Peruvian cuisine. We had a free meal at the latter a couple of days before it officially opened because the owners apparently wanted to conduct a trial run of the kitchen. We can’t wait to go back.

Bridge Markland presented a one-actress performance of Robbers in a Box last this past week at CSULB. The advance publicity hinted that she was adept at playing both female and male roles, and perhaps she is accomplished in that regard if she avails herself of speaking in her native language. Unfortunately, she presented what amounted to a karaoke version of Schiller’s drama. Recorded voices intoned the dialogue as Markland toyed with puppets and a wig to enact an adult variation of a child’s fantasy of theater. Indeed, the title of her evening suggested the mise-en-scene, several short linked walls were unfolded as to resemble a large cardboard container, such as the kind a child might appropriate from the leftovers of a moving-van. Markland use of that space would have been much more lively if she had spent time thinking about ways to incorporate that element into a metatheatrical meditation rather than assembling a collage of pop music songs that rarely seemed to apply to the mood of the moment in the play.

Linda and I saw Sarah Jones in a performance of her Bridge & Tunnel in NYC, and the gap between the Markland’s and Jones’s quality of performance and talent is enormous. I still fondly recollect the manner in which Sarah Jones managed to play a variety of roles with extraordinary dexterity. I would hope to have a chance to see her again. Markland’s performance was simply another evening of theater aspiring to be memorable, but never getting past the first whiff of possibility.

Far, far more accomplished than Markland’s staging was a one-time performance of Langston Hughes’s Ask Your Mama, It opened with a trumpet solo by Ron McCurdy, who walked out of a darkened passageway to the side of the auditorium’s seating onto the stage in a elegant, understated arrival. McCurdy led his band through the paces of a dozen or so compositions with joyful affirmation of one of Hughes’s lesser-known works.  Actor and director Malcolm-Jamal Warner read Hughes’ book-length poem. There were several very witty moments in the text. Hughes recounts Louie Armstrong being asked if he could read music. “Not enough to hurt my playing,” Armstrong replied. (That response reminds me of the section in WC Williams’s Spring & All in which the assessment of technique runs like this: “That sheet stuff’s a lot of cheese.”)

The film collage that accompanied the music and reading of the poem added little to the public performance, which was free and open to the public. I’m happy to report that the Bovard Auditorium was almost completely full. We sat in the first section of the balcony and there are were only a handful of empty sets behind us in the rear balcony.